Designing a Sustainable Supply Chain Agility Model in the Oil and Gas Industry of Bushehr Province Using a Mixed Approach

Authors

    Roohollah Nemati Ph.D. student, Department of Industrial Management,, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish, Iran
    Ahmad Jafarnejad Chaghooshi * Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran jafarnjd@ut.ac.ir
    Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jtesm.3.4.18

Keywords:

Supply Chain, Agility, Sustainability, Oil and Gas Industry, Bushehr Province

Abstract

The primary objective of this research is to design a sustainable supply chain agility model in the oil and gas industry of Bushehr Province. This study employs a mixed-method approach (qualitative-quantitative), content analysis, the fuzzy DEMATEL technique, and the Analytic Network Process (ANP). The statistical population consists of managers, officials, and mid- to senior-level experts from companies operating in the oil and gas industry of Bushehr Province. A sample size of 10 managers, experts, and industry specialists was selected for each stage. The qualitative findings revealed that sustainable supply chain agility indicators are comprised of environmental factors (green purchasing, eco-friendly and economic design and packaging, environmental preservation), economic factors (adoption of information technology, responsiveness, speed, competence, flexibility), and social factors (customer collaboration, ethical purchasing, social responsibility, compliance with laws, integration of relationships, and supplier collaboration). In the quantitative section, the first stage using the fuzzy DEMATEL approach showed that environmental factors fall under the category of effect criteria, while economic and social factors fall under the category of cause variables. ANP findings indicated that among the environmental factors, the green purchasing indicator holds the highest weight (0.33), followed by the environmental preservation indicator (0.087) and eco-friendly and economic design and packaging (0.086). Among the economic factors, the speed indicator has the highest weight (0.0524), followed by flexibility (0.0513) and competence (0.0505). Among the social factors, the customer collaboration indicator (0.0439) and compliance with laws (0.0438) have the highest weight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrokwah-Larbi, K. (2024). Transforming Metaverse Marketing Into Strategic Agility in SMEs Through Mediating

Roles of IMT and CI: Theoretical Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of Contemporary Marketing

Science, 7(1), 56-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcmars-08-2023-0034

Al-Zabidi, A., Rehman, A. U., & Alkahtani, M. (2021). An approach to assess sustainable supply chain agility for a

manufacturing organization. Sustainability, 13(4), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041752

Ali, H., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2019). Influence of Supply Chain Agility on Profitability: Evidence from Pakistan. SSRN.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3510559

Baniasadi, T. (2024). Comparison of Executive Function and Working Memory among Children with High and Low

Levels of Physical Activity. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 5(3), 9-15.

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijeas.5.3.2

Barve, A. (2011). Impact of supply chains agility on customer satisfaction. 2010 International Conference on E-Business,

Management and Economics, IPEDR,

Boubaker, S., Jemai, Z., Sahin, E., & Dallery, Y. (2019). Supply Chain Agility: Review of Situations. ICORES,

Chan, A. T., Ngai, E. W., & Moon, K. K. (2017). The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain

agility on firm performance in the fashion industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 486-499.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006

Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Foropon, C., Graham, G., Giannakis, M., & Mishra, D. B. (2020). Agility in humanitarian supply

chain: an organizational information processing perspective and relational view. Annals of Operations Research, 1-

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03824-0

Escamilla, R., Fransoo, J. C., & Tang, C. S. (2021). Improving agility, adaptability, alignment, accessibility, and

affordability in nanostore supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 30(3), 676-688.

https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13309

Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O'Loughlin, A. (2017). Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility:

a structured literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 379-407.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12096

Goudarzi, G., Mohammadi, M., & Bakhtiyari, H. (2006). Agile Supply Chain: Concepts, Requirements, and Barriers.

Second Conference on Logistics and Supply Chain,

Hamzehlou, M. (2024). System Dynamics Model for an Agile Pharmaceutical Supply Chain During COVID‑19

Pandemic in Iran. PLoS One, 19(1), e0290789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290789

Jamalpour, H. (2021). Investigation and Analysis of Factors Affecting the Improvement of Lean Supply Chain Agility

Using the AHP Method. Apadana Quarterly Journal of Industrial Engineering Studies, 1(1), 9-20.

https://aies.apadana.ac.ir/downloadfilepdf/20693f4c3fb13d6822cb51a6a3d24b91

Kazemi Najafabadi, A., & Ghafari, A. (2018). Development of Domestic Equipment Manufacturing Industry for the

Upstream Oil Sector; Evaluation of the Legal System within the Framework of 'Science and Technology' Policies.

Energy Law Studies, 4(1), 211-239. https://jrels.ut.ac.ir/article_68058.html

Macclever, A., Annan, J., & Boahen, S. (2017). Supply chain flexibility, agility and firm performance. European Journal

of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 5(3), 13-40. http://www.eajournals.org/wpcontent/uploads/Supply-Chain-Flexibility-Agility-And-Firm-Performance.pdf

Rahimi, A., Raad, A., Alamtabriz, A., & Motameni, A. (2019). Providing a model for supply chain agility of groundbased military products and its impact on supply chain performance. International Journal of Industrial Engineering

& Production Research, 30(3), 353-375. https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87241.html

Rehman, A. U., Al-Zabidi, A., AlKahtani, M., Umer, U., & Usmani, Y. S. (2020). Assessment of supply chain agility to

foster sustainability: fuzzy-DSS for a Saudi manufacturing organization. Processes, 8(5), 577.

https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8050577

Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development

and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002

Tayyaran, S., Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., Radfar, R., & Purebrahimi, A. R. (2019). Agent-based model developed to assess

supply chain agility (Case study: Institute of higher education, science and research branch of Tehran). Journal of

System Management, 5(1), 1-18. https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/390139910404.pdf

Wu, K. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., & Lim, M. K. (2017). Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility

under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. International Journal of Production Economics,

, 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.027

Published

2024-11-22

Submitted

2024-07-15

Revised

2024-09-12

Accepted

2024-09-27

Issue

Section

پژوهشی اصیل

How to Cite

Nemati, . R., Jafarnejad Chaghooshi, A., & Amoozad Mahdiraji, H. (2024). Designing a Sustainable Supply Chain Agility Model in the Oil and Gas Industry of Bushehr Province Using a Mixed Approach. Journal of Technology in Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management (JTESM), 3(4), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jtesm.3.4.18

Similar Articles

1-10 of 187

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.